VigPulse

MLB · First five innings · Illustrative demo

SD F5 ML

San Diego Padres vs Colorado Rockies. The board is showing -134 against a de-vigged fair estimate of -145 and a sharp consensus of -142. The demo model scores this 73 out of 100 and labels it WAIT.

Illustrative demoEvery price, book, event, and score on this page is invented sample data on a fixed snapshot (23 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC). This is not a market price, not an available offer, and not a recommendation. No wager is offered anywhere on this site.
State
WAIT
Score
73/100
Estimated edge
+1.92 pts
Half-life
12 min

Price history

de-vigged probability space

Plotted in implied-probability space rather than raw American odds. American odds jump across the -100/+100 boundary, so a chart drawn directly on them distorts distances; the axis is labelled back in American odds so it still reads like a betting chart.

Board price moved from -142 to -134 across the sampled window, against a model fair price that moved from -148 to -145 and a sharp consensus that moved from -145 to -142. All readings are listed in the table below the chart.-133-141-149-60m-45m-30m-15msnap
Board priceModel fairSharp consensus
SD F5 ML sampled prices. Illustrative demo data.
Minutes before snapshotBoardModel fairSharp consensus
60-142-148-145
45-141-147-145
30-139-147-144
15-136-146-143
0-134-145-142

Consensus

weighted sources

No single book is treated as the answer. The fair estimate is a weighted blend, and the weights are part of what makes the estimate a model output rather than a quote.

Weighted consensus sources for this sampled market. Illustrative demo data.
SourceWeightLine
Sharp consensus0.40-142
Latent market0.35-143
Model fair0.25-145

Book dispersion

4 sampled

Where the sampled books actually sit. A stale quote frequently looks like the best number on the board, which is exactly why it is marked rather than silently included.

Sampled book quotes for this market. Book letters are stand-ins and correspond to no real sportsbook. Illustrative demo data.
BookQuoteStatus
Book A-134included
Book B-130best sampled
Book C-137included
Book D-150stale · excluded

First movers

order carries information
  1. 17:41Book B-138

    Moved first on the sample

Information events

what the market reacted to
  1. 17:44Pitching

    Sample bullpen availability note; first-five markets react to this more than full-game markets.

  2. 17:30Data

    One book flagged stale after no observed change through the sample window.

Playable threshold

where the label changes

The same market at a different price is a different decision. This is the price at which the demo model's label changes, which is a more useful thing to know than the label at one price.

Analytic state by available price for this sampled market. Illustrative demo data.
If available atState would be
-125BET
-130BET
-134WAIT
-142PASS
-145PASS

Reasoning

market → state
  1. Market

    The board has drifted from -142 out to -134 while the de-vigged consensus has barely moved. The number available is now cheaper than what the sample consensus says the side is worth.

  2. Divergence

    Book B sits at -130, four cents cheaper than the rest of the sample. That single quote is what keeps a positive number on this row at all.

  3. Risk

    Book D has not moved for the whole sample window and is flagged stale at -150. A stale quote is excluded from consensus rather than counted as a real price.

  4. Uncertainty

    First-five markets are thinner than full-game markets, so the same nominal edge carries a wider band here than it would on a moneyline.

  5. State

    Score 73 falls just under the illustrative threshold of 75. Near-miss rows are shown as WAIT rather than rounded up.

This is the same sequence described on the methodology page, applied to one row.

Decay

How long this would last

An edge is not a fixed quantity waiting to be collected. It decays as the market absorbs whatever produced it, whether or not anyone acts.
Illustrative demoEdge half-lifeSample data
Estimated edge decayAn estimated edge of 1.92 percentage points halving every 12 minutes: about 0.96 points after 12 minutes and about 0.48 points after 24 minutes. Synthetic illustration.0m12m24m36m1.91.0
Half-life 12 min · synthetic estimate

Synthetic decay illustration based on the demo half-life estimate for this row.

Half-life
12 min

Demo estimate

Edge now
+1.92 pts
After 12 min
+0.96 pts
After 24 min
+0.48 pts

Why half-life is scored, not just reported

A large edge that decays in three minutes is usually worth less than a small one that holds for twenty, because the time it takes to notice, check, and act is not zero. Persistence is a scoring component for that reason.

Snapshot 23 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC · Sample snapshot timestamp — fixed value, not a feed reading.

Other rows

The rest of the sampled board